a0001
jAllen Akin
kPurpose of This Conference
m
d11:53:06 04/15/80
i0
lThis conference is devoted to the study of the Henry Camp school
lof Empirical Metaphysics.
z
a0002
jWin Strickland
kt
m
d13:39:17 04/15/80
i84
lThis is to let all the users know that Henry would be proud of using
lthis conference in his memory...
lEven though everyone has a different memory of poor Henry.
z
a0003
jPaul Manno
kNwe user welcome
mnone
d14:06:02 04/15/80
i193
lHello Dan,
l   Welcome to the wonderful world of moot!
z
a0004
jPaul Manno
kNwe user welcome
mnone
d14:06:12 04/15/80
i256
lHello Dan,
l   Welcome to the wonderful world of moot!
z
a0005
jPaul Manno
kNwe user welcome
mnone
d14:06:42 04/15/80
i319
lHello Dan,
l   Welcome to the wonderful world of moot!
z
a0006
jPaul Manno
kNwe user welcome
mnone
d14:06:49 04/15/80
i382
lHello Dan,
l   Welcome to the wonderful world of moot!
z
a0007
jDan Forsyth
kmoot
m
d14:11:23 04/15/80
i445
lCan I make entries in this conference?
z
a0008
jPaul Manno
ktesting the submit problem
mnone
d17:55:40 04/15/80
i493
lThis text is here for the expressed purpose of a test.
z
a0009
jWin Strickland
kRepetitiveness in conference entries
m3 4 5 6
d10:01:55 04/16/80
i561
lSome people tend to repeat themselves for some unapparent reason.
z
a0010
jPaul Manno
kApparent repetitiveness of conference entries
m9
d14:09:02 04/16/80
i644
lSometimes, when a new user is using software he or she is not
lcompletely familiar with, mistakes will occur. Such mistakes
lcan often result in the erroneous inclusion of many duplicate
lentries. Since the duplicate entries that you refer to were
lpart of a learning experience and they prompted a change in
lthe software, I would believe that they were useful. That is
lthe reason for the apparent duplication of entries in this
lconference.
z
a0011
jWin Strickland
kExcuseeeeee me
m10, 3, 4, 5, 6
d13:05:30 04/17/80
i918
lPardon me for stepping on toes, I was only commenting to add another
lentry to this conference.
z
a0012
jperry flinn
kcritique of previous entries
mall
d13:40:09 04/18/80
i1008
lPardon my uninformed observations, but I have yet to read an
lentry in this conference that makes the least bit of sense!
lIf I didn't know better, I would claim that the entries
lheretofore submitted were nothing more than idle chatter
lproduced solely for the purpose of allowing the submitter
lto "hear himself talk."
z
a0013
jPaul Manno
kCritiques
m12
d11:13:30 04/21/80
i1213
lSince the inception of this conference, many people have added
ltext for the primary purpose of testing 'moot'. As it seems to
lhave generated some rather "light" reading material while
lfulfilling the purpose of testing 'moot', I can see no particular
lreason for the necessity of critiquing the other entries. Perhaps
lwhat we need is a conference named 'bull' in which most of this
ltesting can be accomplished.
z
a0014
jPaul Manno
kExcuuuuuuuusssssssssssssssse Meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
m11
d11:16:27 04/21/80
i1454
lThe entry to which you refer was not intended to serve as
la reprimand for its refered entries; insetad it was simply
lan attempt to answer the question that was asked in the 
lpreviously referred-to entry. No appology was necessary.
z
a0015
jWin Strickland
kgot me, its late tonight
mnone in particular other than 14
d23:17:58 05/12/80
i1625
lnoise noise noise
l
li can hear myself talking indeed.
l
lno apology given then.
l
land so onl
l
lif you can figure this out, congratulations.
l
lIn the future I will try and take a more serious attitude to this 
lconference, but I could not resist one last parting shot.
l
lAhem.
z